JAMMU: In a significant order Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. A. Mir. Judge J&K High Court Jammu admitted the writ pet
ition filed by Peerzada Mohammad Syeed challenging the Order dated 17.02.2012 passed by SAC initiating suo-motto proceedings against Peerzada Mohammad Syeed Minister for Public Enterprises. Petitioner has called in question the constitutional validity of regulation 9 framed by SAC in 2005 which empowers the SAC to initiate suo-motto action besides Order of SAC dated 17.02.2012.
The counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that SAC cannot expand its jurisdiction by framing a regulation contrary to the SAC Act 2002 and the rules framed there under. It was further submitted that a definite procedure has been provided under the Act for filing a complaint which has to be supported by an affidavit of complainant. It was also contended that section24 of SAC Act 2002 provides penalty for false and vexatious complaint and in case the present proceedings are found to be baseless, SAC shall not be in a position to remedy the damage caused to the petitioner. It was further argued that section 21 of SAC. Act 2002 provides submission of final reports regarding complaints enquired into by the commission. Thus if suo-motto jurisdiction is conceded then all these provisions shall become redundant. Needless to mention that SAC filed caveat through senior counsel Mr. Sunil Sethi and opposed the petition.
For petitioner Sr. Advocate Mr. U. K. Jalali along with H. A. Siddiqui Advocate appeared. The Hon’ble High Court framed the legal issues raised in the petition and admitted the same which shall now be listed after Four Weeks.
With this Order proceedings against Peerzada Mohammad Syeed Minister for Public Enterprises shall remain stayed before State Accountability Commission till the issue is decided by the Hon’ble J&K High Court. (KMW NEWS)
