• Login
Tuesday, July 15, 2025
No Result
View All Result
Kashmir Media Watch
  • Home
  • FeaturedNew
  • Kashmir
  • Jammu
  • India
  • Ladakh
  • Business
  • World
  • Sports
  • Interviews
  • Entertainment
  • OP-ED
  • Branded Post
  • Home
  • FeaturedNew
  • Kashmir
  • Jammu
  • India
  • Ladakh
  • Business
  • World
  • Sports
  • Interviews
  • Entertainment
  • OP-ED
  • Branded Post
No Result
View All Result
Kashmir Media Watch
No Result
View All Result

Army Chief Meets MoS Defence, PM Silent On Age Row

Online Desk by Online Desk
January 19, 2012
in India
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

New Delhi: Even as controversy continued to rage over Army Chief Gen V K Singh’s date of birth, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh today steered clear of making any comment, contending that the matter was “sensitive”.

His evasiveness on the issue came on the eve of hearing by the Supreme Court of a petition filed by a private organisation in support of Gen Singh. It was not clear whether a petition filed by Gen Singh himself would come up tomorrow.

RelatedPosts

Kavinder Gupta appointed as LG Ladakh

CM Omar Abdullah inaugurates Travel & Tourism Fair Kolkata-2025

Centre approves release of more than one thousand crore rupees to flood, landslides, affected States of Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Kerala, Uttarakhand

“It is a sensitive issue. I do not want to comment,” the Prime Minister said on the sidelines of a function to launch the book ‘The Tribune 13 Years: A Witness to History.

He was asked about the controversy surrounding the age of Army Chief who has dragged the government to the Supreme Court to seek a direction that his date of birth on military records be treated as May 10, 1951 and not 1950.

Meanwhile, the Army Chief met Minister of State for Defence M M Pallam Raju this afternoon, a day after the latter expressed unhappiness over the matter being taken to court.

It was not clear as to what transpired at the unscheduled meeting between Raju and Gen Singh but it is believed to have been arranged to clarify things.

“It is an unfortunate development and it is not a healthy precedent either for the (Defence) Ministry or the armed forces… It is an unhealthy precedent. It does not auger well either for the Ministry or the forces,” Raju had said yesterday while reacting to a question on the issue.

Gen Singh moved the Supreme Court on Monday challenging the government’s rejection of his claim on his date of birth. The Defence Ministry had recently rejected his contention that he was born in 1951 and not in 1950.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

In its recent order, the Ministry has taken his date of birth as May 10, 1950, and not May 10, 1951, which the General has claimed as real as per his matriculation certificate.

An organisation The Grenadiers Association, Rohtak Chapter, had earlier filed an application in the apex court in support of Gen Singh. It is slated to come up tomorrow.

In his own petition, the Army Chief has contended that he was treated by the government in a manner which reflects total lack of procedure and principles of natural justice in deciding his age.

In his 68-page petition, Gen Singh has challenged the government’s “illegal and arbitrary” rejection of his Statutory Complaint to Defence Minister A K Antony on December 30 last for accepting May 10, 1951 as his date of birth.

ADVERTISEMENT

He has termed it as violation of his fundamental rights.

Seeking the quashing of this order, the Army Chief has pleaded that the government be directed to treat May 10, 1951 as his date of birth and “grant all consequential reliefs thereto”.

“The respondent (government) needs to explain as to why the senior most officer of the Army could be treated in a manner which reflects total lack of procedure and principles of natural justice and that too on an opinion obtained from the Attorney General,” his petition said.

Gen Singh also wondered as to why the Ministry of Defence would doubt the records in the Adjutant General’s branch, the official record-keeper of the Army, has not been explained. Nor has any authority while rejecting his plea for treating his date of birth as 10.5.1951 ever doubted the birth certificate of the petitioner.(KMW News)

Next Post

No Extension Will Be Given To ISI Chief Shuja Pasha

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Kashmir Media Watch

Kashmir Media Watch (launched on 12 March, 2010), a pioneer among news portals in J&K, owes its origin to the idea that an unbiased, impartial and objective reporting on Kashmir is posted out to readers worldwide who want to remain updated on what is happening in Kashmir.
Contact us: kashmirmediawatch2010@gmail.com

Categories

  • Archives
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Featured
  • Health
  • India
  • Interviews
  • Jammu
  • Kashmir
  • Ladakh
  • OP-ED
  • PR
  • Sports
  • Videos
  • World
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

©2024 Kashmir Media Watch - Powered by 8-Bit Studios

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Featured
  • Kashmir
  • Jammu
  • India
  • Ladakh
  • Business
  • World
  • Sports
  • Interviews
  • Entertainment
  • OP-ED
  • Branded Post

©2024 Kashmir Media Watch - Powered by 8-Bit Studios

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.

Discover more from Kashmir Media Watch

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading